Why athletes making money will lead to education

It has been a bedrock principle behind college sports: Student-athletes should not be paid beyond the costs of attending a university. California threatened that standard on Monday after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill to allow players to strike endorsement deals and hire agents. Why is that? The N. Both the N. With limited exceptions, the schools and the N. Students will also be permitted to hire agents, a move now restricted. Skinner introduced the legislation in February, and Newsom said he had not expected it to reach his desk. Still, sensing erucation severity of the legislative threat from California, as well as from a handful of other states and Congress, the N. At least on this issue, the sentiment was bipartisan; the bill passed unanimously. Like Newsom, Senator Brian Jones, a Republican from San Diego County who supported the legislation, doubted that the leaders in college sports would pull together quick reforms. The legislation left open the possibility that California could rework its approach once the N. Before and after it became law, the California proposal drew strong support from some current and former student-athletes who said athltes it would edge the college sports industry, however reluctantly, toward an era when its athletes would be compensated for their talents and the risks that they assume. Newsom signed the bill during an episode of a television show hosted by LeBron James, the Los Angeles Lakers star and a prominent supporter of the legislation.

College athletes matter to billion-dollar companies

Tennessee must take the reins and prevent the NCAA from continuing its pay blackout on college athletes. Vanderbilt defeats Missouri on Saturday, October 19th, Editorial Board October 20, Such successful sports programs have helped the Athletic Department rake in millions of dollars. More states, including our home state Tennessee, should consider passing similar laws. The organization remains steadfast in its practice of preventing players from earning any income for their work. This not only prevents schools from paying athletes but also bars athletes from earning income through their personal brand. He has painted efforts to change this status quo as a war on amateurism, as an attempt to turn student athletes into employees. Two-thirds of Americans believed that college athletes should be paid when their name or image are used to produce a profit, according to a poll conducted by The Washington Post and UMass Lowell which surveyed people. In order to maintain parity in athletic program attractiveness across the country, other schools have to adapt to compete. It has many options and need to look no further than the Fair Pay to Play Act for direction. The American people want this to happen.

Latest College Sports

Now that the football season is over, college sports fans have several options. They can argue about whether next year the University of Alabama will defend its College Football Playoff National Championship title. Or they can turn to watching some of the more than 50 National Collegiate Athletic Association basketball games televised each week. These obvious choices do not exhaust the possibilities for excitement, because the real game is going to be played off the court and in court. District Court judge Claudia Wilken will be holding a hearing on motions for summary judgment in the case of Jenkins v. That may be good news for student athletes who think they are financially exploited. Less clear is how the other principle participant — the college athletics department — will fare under the new arrangements. If college athletes are allowed to be paid salaries, what will the impact be on intercollegiate athletics programs’ budgets and operations? Most likely, no college athletics director will relish the new professionalization, because paying salaries to players will increase program expenditures without necessarily increasing revenues. But if the court does approve player payment, a handful of powerful programs will stand to gain in competition for athletic talent simply because they can afford to pay salaries. Others will mimic as they try to keep up but eventually will fall short in trying to outbid Auburn University, Florida State, the University of Southern California or the University of Texas in the college player arms race. With the added expense of paying some athletes salaries, most programs will go deeper in debt. The harsh reality is that they will still fall behind as the gap in the competition for star athletes will widen, with the Bowl Championship Series conference members gaining a pronounced edge. This syndrome of the rich getting richer among big-time college sports programs is not surprising. Less obvious is that with player payroll expenses, even many of the high-profile, commercially successful college sports programs will face unexpected consequences that will strain their annual operating budgets. For example, when an athletics department pays a salary instead of providing a grant in aid, it faces substantial new expenses for no gain in services. It must pay federal taxes for Medicare and Social Security, matching the dollar amount paid by the employee. Athletic departments pay another price if they shift from scholarships to salaries. Under the new rules, that potential subsidy would evaporate.

Site Index

California has fired the first shot in the fight against the unfair pay practices of the NCAA. Gavin Newsom, allows for college athletes to profit off their own name and likeness. The NCAA, which currently bans student athletes from receiving any compensation at all, is angry about the law. And every state should adopt it. The bill, which passed with overwhelming support and enjoyed the backing of superstars like LeBron James, is a major step toward leveling the playing field pardon the pun with the NCAA, which rakes in more than a billion dollars in revenue from college sports. Coaches also hit the jackpot in this system: College football or basketball coaches were the highest paid public employees in 39 states as of Meanwhile, stories of their players struggling to eat while working near-full work weeks are all too common. Yet the NCAA also put out a survey reporting that many of them work at least 30 hours a week, and often more than 40 hours, on their sport. So, for all intents and purposes, these players are workers, breaking their backs for their bosses and employers to get rich. But when these athletes are significantly more likely to suffer chronic injuries long-term than non-college athletes — the CDC says there are around , injuries in college sports a year — who really is being selfish? The people risking their bodies, or the ones making money off that damage? Only a small percentage of these young people risking life and limb even have a chance of making a professional career out of it. So what good is this system? They trot out stats that more than 80 percent of student-athletes end up getting a degree. But with athletes working full work weeks to train — never mind actually competing — do their schools really care about their education? So yes, college athletes should absolutely be paid. The California bill is a starting point, and an important one at that. He wrote this for InsideSources. Skip to content. California will let college athletes hire agents and make money from endorsements, defying the NCAA and setting up a likely legal challenge that could reshape U. Latest Op-Eds. American politics are stranger than fiction. The January thaw is nothing to be celebrated. Raising the minimum wage can save lives.

Colleges value coaches’ labor more than their players

Tiger Woods, along with many other professional athletes, certainly think aghletes. But do these athletes really deserve all that money? In my mind, absolutely not. Teaching is one of the most economically important occupations because our future economy relies on the education of its youth, yet teachers are paid astronomically less than the average professional athlete is. While President Obama is hard at work reviving the economy, the unproven rookie in the MLB is earning way over wh figure.

Furthermore, police officers, firefighters, and doctors save lives while risking their own for a fraction of what sports stars make. People in athetes military leave their families at home to defend and protect the country knowing they may never return. It’s truly a pity that none of these true heroes are given the same recognition by society as athletes such as Brett Favre or Michael Jordan are given. Moreover, in tahletes mind, if these athletes want to continue to be rewarded with the fame and fortune that is unfairly bestowed upon them, they must prove to the world that they are going to be positive role models for future athletes, and those who admire.

Athleres infamous players must grow up, and prove to America that they can be positive role models for kids on and off the field. They may get leeway when it comes to their salaries, but the law should be overpowered by any amount of talent.

In order for these players to gain respect, they need to have a more eucation impact on the community. Finally, what really puzzles me, is how athletes get upset when athletes say that millions of dollars won’t be able to support him and his family, and that they need maikng. What puzzles me even more, is how after holding out why athletes making money will lead to education weeks, and sometimes months, the owners give in and pay them what they don’t deserve.

Think about Jamarcus Russel, the former No. In any other job, if you don’t perform to your expectations, you’re fired.

There is no guaranteed money. The whole system that allows professional athletes to just swim around in money is simply ridiculous, and it needs to stop. When asking whyy whether they think athletes are paid way too much money, most agree with me. Related A Franchise Left Tackle?

Colleges value coaches’ labor more than their players

It’s not enough for the organization to flash a knife and demand players’ wallets; it also has to tell everyone within earshot that, no, actually, empty pockets are good. That’s how the NCAA argues that its amateurism rules — which limit player compensation to tuition, room, board and small cost-of-living stipends, but do not restrict sports administrators such as Alabama football coach Nick Saban from collecting millions — are necessary and wny because they protect and enhance athletes’ educations. There’s no connection between cash in a player’s hands — or a W-2 form in their mailbox — and their ability to open a textbook or show up to class. But that hasn’t stopped the NCAA from making this case in the court of public opinion and, more recently, in federal court. In a bench trial overseen by U. They argue that it violates antitrust law by restraining competitive bidding among schools for the services of top athletes, similar to how tech giants allegedly conspired to whj down salaries by agreeing to not hire one another’s employees. Wilken’s ruling could come as soon as December. If athletes win and withstand a lengthy appeals process, it could utterly transform the plantation economy of big-time college sports. Depending on the scope of Wilken’s ruling — she could loosen NCAA restrictions a bit or a lot, or even eliminate them entirely — a gold-medal-winning Olympic swimmer like Katie Ledecky would be able to endorse products without jeopardizing her college eligibility. Football stars such as former University of Georgia running back Why athletes making money will lead to education Gurley wlil sell their autographs for cash without sending state legislators scrambling to criminalize the act. Individual schools could pay athletes as little or as much as they like — the same way they now pay strength coaches, athletic directors, school presidents, grad students and everyone else with a campus job. Actually requiring that athletes be paid would be beyond the scope of an antitrust case. The NCAA is telling Wilken that paying players would have «staggering and destructive implications» why athletes making money will lead to education college sports — and for the educations of campus athletes.